A group of self-governing researchers from the US is rallying around a curiously ship - forge ridge on a Turkish great deal – and they ’re pretty confident they will eventually unearth the wreck of Noah ’s Ark. It ’s a fascinating project , but these sheer claims of biblical archeology should be taken with a pinch of Dead Sea common salt .
TheDurupınar siteis a geologic formation located along the southern flank of Mount Tendürek in eastern Turkey . stretch 164 meters ( 538 feet ) in distance , the strange shape of the mount has led some to believe it contains the petrified ruination of the original Noah ’s Ark , the giant boat in the Genesis deluge myth that was said to provide shelter for every single fauna species on Earth during a biblical deluge .
It was first identified in 1948 , although it lay in proportional obscureness until the recent seventies and ' 80s when it bewitch the aid of Ron Wyatt , a self - styled amateur archaeologist who brazenly claim it was the landing place of Noah ’s Ark.
Wyatt was n’t shy about advertise his far - fetched ideas . He also asserted that he had key out several other key scriptural situation and artifacts , include the remains of the cities ofSodom and Gomorrah , the location of the Red Sea crossing , and even theArk of the Covenantbeneath the Temple Mount in Jerusalem .
Private group , including Wyatt and some Turkish researchers , have carry on geophysical sketch of the Durupınar internet site several times , first in the 1980s , and then again in 2010 , 2014 , and 2019 . However , none of their findings have ever been made public . Meanwhile , others ' title about the web site have typically gone nowhere , often sack by experts as nothing more than natural rock formations .
Nevertheless , the belief refuses to go away . One group fascinated with the Durupınar site is the California enquiry collective experience as Noah ’s Ark Scan . Despite the tabloid newspaper headline , the team has no immediate plans to hollow . In the meantime , their antecedence is preserving the site and admit Turkish scientists to carry out further non - invading body of work .
“ Excavations at the ‘ gravy holder site ’ have n’t bulge out yet because we first need more geophysical survey , core drilling , and careful provision . The location lie down in an participating earth flow with harsh winters , so protecting the field is our top priority , ” Noah ’s Ark Scan said in a recentstatement .
“ Over the next few years , our Turkish university partners will conduct non - destructive examination — like soil sampling , radar scan , and other method — to determine if the structures we ’ve detected are truly man - made or simply innate formations . Only after we gather enough evidence and have a proper preservation plan in place will we consider excavating , ” they add .
The evidence so far suggests that the Durupınar internet site is nothing more than an interesting natural geologic formation . David Fasold , a research worker who joined Wyatt on the early jaunt in eastern Turkey , was initially convinced the mound did represent a obscure shipwreck , but he eventually grow sceptical .
In 1996 , he co - author apeer - reviewed papercalled “ Bogus ‘ Noah ’s Ark ’ from Turkey unwrap as a Common Geologic Structure ” – whose title address for itself .
There isno scientific evidencethat a global flowage swept the Earth in ancient times , let alone that a man named Noah build a monumental ship to save all life from the cloudburst . Even so , it is attain how many cultures havemyths about a capital flood , from the MesopotamianEpic of Gilgameshand the biblical story of Noah to similar legends among the ancient Greeks , Hindus , and autochthonic peoples of the Americas .
This widespread theme raises compelling questions . Are these stories echoes of real , localize rude catastrophe passed down through generation ? Or do they reflect something more symbolic , a deeper ethnic narrative about destruction , natural selection against the odds , and the human battle to rule guild in a chaotic world ?
