One of the foundational principles of the scientific method is that if novel evidence shows you to be wrong , you should admit it , and revise your worldview .

Well , we admit it : we were incorrect . The Loch Ness Monster isreal , and now there ’s proof .

See that ? That V shape in the water ? That ’s Nessie . Or at least , it could be , concord to the English couple who take hold of the arguably more or less underwhelming footage .

“ I really do n’t know what it was in the water . It was something orotund . I do n’t think it really equates on the video recording quite how large it was , ” the wife , who , like her husband , prefers to continue anonymous , told the Daily Mail .

“ From what we could judge , it was between 20 and 30 feet long , ” she say .

If you , like us , are having a surd fourth dimension wee-wee out that stratum of point from the video , fear not : the pair take a firm stand that it was more impressive in somebody . manifestly , the “ creature ” was “ actuate itself with something , ” maybe a quintet or some sort of branch , which it used “ like an oar . ”

The wolf also appear to have had Nessie ’s tell - tale plesiosauroid physical structure shape , arrant with “ lumps or humps or whatever they are ” which “ keep disappearing under the water , ” the woman explain .

Now , some of you nay - Dorothy Leigh Sayers out there may point to the many , many , example where previous “ sightings ” of the coy cryptid have turned out to be more routine instance of the local wildlife , like stamp , Pisces the Fishes , or * checks notes*logs .

But according to Gary Campbell , Keeper of the Official Loch Ness Monster Register , this is some of the good evidence he ’s ever see in favour of the existence of the monster .

“ There ’s been two or three really good videos in the past , ” Campbell tell the Mail . “ But this is certainly up there with the good of them . When something like this comes along which is authentically inexplicable then it is great . ”

Of course , with most scientific discoveries of this magnitude , you ’d expect some pretty tight peer review . While Campbell has the experience – he ’s dedicate the last 26 long time of his life to logging sightings of the 1,500 - to-180,000,000 - year - old Scottish resident – the span receive further scientific examination , telling the Mail that they would “ emphatically love for somebody to analyze the video . ”

“ If it aid anybody work out what ’s down there then it ’d be our absolute pleasure , ” the woman told the Mail . “ We would be delighted . ”

In which case , we have excellent word for the couple , as Dr Darren Naish , a zoologist , and author ofHunting Monsters : Cryptozoology and the Reality Behind the myth , has indeed analyze the video .

“ I opine they ’re likely ducks , ” hesaidof the footage .

Despite the obvious fact that there ’s no such affair as an Official Loch Ness Duck Register , Naish told the Mail that the video recording showed “ nothing more than unidentifiable jot on the water . ”

“ There ’s no indication that we ’re seeing something that ’s especially orotund or unusual in shape , ” he said . “ establish on how boat appear from the same rough locating and distance , the object must be lowly – I estimate less than 50 cm [ 19.7 inches ] long . I see no reason why they ca n’t be bird . ”

But what about the giant V , Naish ? Surely thatcouldn’t be induce by a duck ?

“ The wakes they leave on the surface face interesting , ” Naish told the Mail , “ but wakes of this sort are common on the loch ’s Earth’s surface when conditions are right . ”

Well … fine . Let ’s say the panel is still out on the existence of a lone Plesiosaurus somehow surviving in a Scotch lake for millions of years , passing the time by peep out of the water just enough to get some random tourists take a blurry exposure that looks , through no fault of their own , suspiciously likea toy submarine with a carve Nessie head glued to the top .

Oh well . At least it was n’t agigantic hulk dickthis meter .